🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has repeatedly shown his wish to see opponents investigated, exerting influence on the DOJ to charge former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay any longer, it's damaging our standing and credibility," the president wrote last month in a Truth Social post.

"I was impeached twice, and charged me (five times!)" he declared, referencing the multiple legal proceedings he faced after leaving the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Both have subsequently been indicted, in cases that numerous specialists have stated appear to be politically motivated and difficult to succeed in court.

But the latest allegations against a presidential opponent, ex national security adviser John Bolton, stand apart, legal specialists and ex-prosecutors say.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's charges to James' is like equating apples to oranges," said Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of the Case

Bolton has been criminally indicted on federal charges pertaining to the supposed mishandling of classified information. Since leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a outspoken presidential opponent, going so far as to call him "remarkably ignorant" and unsuitable for the presidency in his memoir.

Experts say that while there may be political motivations to target Bolton, the procedures used to obtain an indictment and the evidence gathered against him suggest a possibly more substantial legal argument than the DOJ brought against James.

"This misconduct that's being alleged is both more severe and seems to have taken place over a significant period of time," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

During his time as Trump's national security adviser, and after his 2019 White House departure, authorities claimed that Bolton placed the country at risk by wrongfully retaining and sending classified information to family members using insecure means, including AOL. Some of the documents were labeled top secret.

The charge alleges that at one point a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's account where documents were kept and transmitted an apparent warning to cause "the biggest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a hearing on Friday to eighteen distinct charges of mishandling classified information.

Retribution or a Strong Legal Argument?

The timing of his indictment - coming on the tails of charges against James - has revived concerns about external influence on the justice system.

Trump once suggested Bolton belonged in prison, and called him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his part, authored a book about his time in the Trump government that was sharply negative of the leader.

"There's no question that the schedule of this charge, when combined with additional cases, has prompted doubts about the validity of these charges, and the reason these charges are being filed now," said Jamil Jaffer, founder and director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "should the Justice Department is capable to demonstrate the facts stated and demonstrate the material is correctly classified, his conduct may very well have broken the statute".

Charging such a senior figure for improperly handling classified documents is "rare" but not unprecedented, said Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Situations that involve sensitive materials pose difficulties to prosecute, but they may and are filed against both low-level and high-level personnel, from time to time," she said.

Parallels to Investigations into Former President and Biden

Trump likewise faced allegations of wrongfully storing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and hindering their recovery, but that case was ultimately dismissed by a court official and voided by his return as leader.

A special counsel also determined that former President Joe Biden wrongfully stored classified documents from his period as second-in-command, but failed to criminally charge him.

Bolton's situation shares characteristics to Biden's classified documents issues, said Mr Lesko, who previously held a top national security role at the Justice Department.

Strict procedures regulate the handling of sensitive materials. To win a guilty verdict, the government must demonstrate that Bolton knew the material he was transmitting was classified, and he had to intentionally transfer it to someone without authorization to receive it.

"Because of the classified nature of the material at issue in this case, we don't have a great deal of particulars about why the government believes elements like the diary entries and the other information he shared by electronic message, and the reason there were classified," said Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Traditional Legal Action

The process by which the DOJ initiated this case will be closely examined, following Trump openly posted his desire to see his political opponents charged and several of those charges came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's situation, prosecutors appear to have adhered to protocol.

"This Bolton prosecution and ultimately the indictment appeared to have followed the standard process including the rules and standards within the DOJ," he stated.

In contrast to Comey's short, concise indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" filing that "explicitly sets forth the details concerning the circumstances and circumstances here," Mr Lesko commented.

"It seems reasonably consistent with a long line of cases... where government officials mishandled and transmitted sensitive information."