🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has become part of the growing list of performers who voice skepticism about the necessity of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she chose not to use their assistance while working on her latest project Die My Love.

Examining the Purpose of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

On-set intimacy professionals emerged following the #MeToo era to guarantee the security and ease of performers during sequences involving partial undress and sexual content. Yet, numerous well-known actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their involvement, with several suggesting they disrupt creative flow.

Lawrence's Personal Experience

In conversation on the popular culture podcast, while discussing her latest project where she plays a woman descending into mental health challenges, the actress stated: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or perhaps we did have one but didn't really utilize them... I felt entirely secure with Rob."

She continued: "Rob is completely professional and very committed to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations mostly revolved around family life and personal connections. There was never awkward tension or doubts about personal boundaries."

"Had there been the slightest indication of unease, I definitely would have requested an on-set professional. Many male actors get upset if you aren't interested in their advances, and subsequently the negative treatment starts. He was completely different."

Industry Recognition and Ongoing Debate

Earlier this week, industry platform IMDb officially recognized on-set intimacy professionals as a distinct credit, together with eleven other professional roles including dance direction, craft services, and puppetry. Previously, they were grouped under "miscellaneous staff" rather than having their specific credit.

Notwithstanding this validation, these professionals still encounter public discussion suggesting they aren't necessarily industry essential, with well-known actors rejecting their involvement. Lawrence's perspective echoes that of another prominent actress, who earlier shared she refused intimacy coordination while filming alongside her co-star on The Morning Show.

Aniston's Experience

"He proved to be extremely respectful – truly every move, between takes, 'Are you OK?" she remembered. "The scenes were also very choreographed. That's the benefit of working with skilled editors, appropriate music. So, you don't prepare."

Aniston continued, "They offered, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Please, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're seasoned actors – we can manage appropriately. And we had our director present."

Other Examples and Industry Reaction

Despite featuring numerous scenes of intimate moments and frequent nudity, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's Oscar-winning film about a sex worker and a Russian oligarch's son – filmed without an intimacy coordinator.

The film's star stated she and fellow actor Mark Eydelshteyn "decided it would be preferable to keep it small."

"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had studied Sean's films and recognized his commitment to authenticity. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I treated it as professional work."

These statements generated significant backlash from intimacy coordinators, mirroring the response to another actress's public statements, who recently shared that filming her new movie Marty Supreme marked her initial experience with the emerging role, which she "did not know existed."

Paltrow's Perspective

When asked about comfort level with a specific move alongside fellow actor her younger counterpart, the actress answered: "I'm from the era where you remove clothing, you get in bed, the filming begins."

Paltrow added that she and her co-star then told the professional: "We think we're comfortable. You can step back.' I can't speak to how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, extremely restricted by that."

Professional Reaction

Following these comments, former Channel 4 drama head Caroline Hollick described them as "concerning" and highlighted that the majority of those speaking against these professionals possess sufficient fame to maintain personal authority and protection on film sets.

"Periodically an actor makes comments about whether they appreciate intimacy coordinators or not," said Hollick. "Gwyneth Paltrow mentioned she came of age in a time when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood performing alongside a man much younger than her, although likely Chalamet is chill, I found it quite an irresponsible statement."

Male Perspective

Michael Douglas, in contrast, shared that he believes the primary responsibility during intimate sequences rests with the male performer, instead of a external professional.

"Based on my career, you assume duty as the man to ensure the woman is comfortable, you discuss it thoroughly," he explained. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's agreeable'. It's extremely careful but seems like it's occurring organically, which is ideally what authentic performance appears as."