🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, nations are channeling hundreds of billions into what is known as “sovereign AI” – creating domestic artificial intelligence systems. From Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are vying to build AI that comprehends regional dialects and cultural specifics.

The Global AI Competition

This initiative is an element in a larger international competition spearheaded by large firms from the United States and China. Whereas companies like OpenAI and a social media giant pour enormous funds, developing countries are also placing their own investments in the AI landscape.

However with such tremendous amounts involved, is it possible for developing nations secure notable benefits? According to an expert from a prominent thinktank, “Unless you’re a rich government or a large firm, it’s quite a challenge to create an LLM from the ground up.”

Security Concerns

A lot of states are hesitant to rely on overseas AI models. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for example, Western-developed AI tools have at times proven inadequate. An illustrative case featured an AI assistant used to teach learners in a isolated village – it communicated in English with a strong US accent that was hard to understand for regional students.

Furthermore there’s the defence factor. In the Indian military authorities, employing specific external systems is considered unacceptable. Per an developer noted, “It could have some random training dataset that might say that, for example, Ladakh is separate from India … Using that particular AI in a security environment is a serious concern.”

He added, I’ve discussed with experts who are in security. They aim to use AI, but, disregarding specific systems, they prefer not to rely on US systems because data might go outside the country, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

Domestic Efforts

As a result, a number of nations are funding domestic initiatives. An example such effort is underway in the Indian market, where a firm is striving to develop a domestic LLM with government funding. This initiative has allocated about 1.25 billion dollars to machine learning progress.

The developer imagines a AI that is less resource-intensive than top-tier systems from American and Asian tech companies. He notes that the nation will have to compensate for the financial disparity with talent. Based in India, we don’t have the option of allocating massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we contend against such as the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the US is pumping in? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the brain game is essential.”

Local Emphasis

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is supporting AI systems developed in local native tongues. These dialects – for example the Malay language, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and others – are often poorly represented in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the experts who are developing these independent AI models were informed of the extent to which and just how fast the cutting edge is progressing.

A senior director involved in the initiative says that these models are created to supplement larger AI, as opposed to displacing them. Systems such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he says, often find it challenging to handle regional languages and cultural aspects – interacting in awkward the Khmer language, for example, or suggesting non-vegetarian dishes to Malay individuals.

Building local-language LLMs permits state agencies to include local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a powerful system created in other countries.

He adds, I am cautious with the concept independent. I think what we’re trying to say is we want to be better represented and we wish to grasp the capabilities” of AI systems.

International Collaboration

For countries attempting to carve out a role in an escalating international arena, there’s a different approach: join forces. Experts associated with a well-known institution recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a alliance of emerging countries.

They refer to the project “a collaborative AI effort”, drawing inspiration from the European productive play to create a rival to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. The plan would see the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would combine the capabilities of several states’ AI programs – including the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and Sweden – to develop a competitive rival to the Western and Eastern major players.

The primary researcher of a paper setting out the concept states that the concept has attracted the attention of AI officials of at least three nations up to now, in addition to several sovereign AI companies. While it is presently centered on “mid-sized nations”, emerging economies – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have additionally indicated willingness.

He comments, Currently, I think it’s just a fact there’s diminished faith in the commitments of the present US administration. Individuals are wondering such as, can I still depend on these technologies? In case they choose to